Love: truth’s minder
God is not mocked… hypocrisy can be life-threatening
As a youngster I used to love our family gatherings. Dad had a superb, if untrained, tenor voice and his ‘party pieces’ were always in demand. Although, most often, he sang old Irish ballads, his playful humour would occasionally rise to a comic duet with one of my aunts: ‘Anything you can do, I can do better’. The song came back to mind when I was reading Dr Luke’s fifth chapter of Acts….
Chapter four ends with a footnote on normal church life: “Joseph, who was also called by the apostles Barnabas (which means son of encouragement), a Levite, a native of Cyprus, sold a field that belonged to him and brought the money and laid it at the apostles’ feet.” (Acts 4:36-37)
Just before Luke mentions Barnabas’ generosity, he makes a simple but arresting observation about the earliest church:“There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold and laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need”. (Acts 4:34-35) In the short span of their Spirit-led existence, Jesus’ shared love had made poverty history – that is, within the Christian community. This is the inspired context in which Luke mentions Barnabas. His generosity was the natural expression of a gloriously infectious mutual concern.
Don’t let’s miss the importance of this. Here is a community, predominantly, though not exclusively, Jewish, looking very different from the surrounding culture. It got them noticed. Moses had always understood that God created Israel and set His people apart to learn His wisdom and reveal their God to the nations. (Deuteronomy 4:5-8) Now, led by the very prophet like himself that Moses had predicted, those who share father Abraham’s faith have become again that holy nation – marked out from the nations by their love and their rejection of self-interest. Imagine the visual impact of a selfless community amidst a selfish culture!
Luke’s heart-warming description drops our guard. We are not prepared for the shocking contrast as chapter five opens: “Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. With his wife’s full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles’ feet.” (Acts 5:1-2)
Suddenly there’s a chill in the air… Luke’s subtle description alerts us to something not quite right.Ananias,‘also’(i.e. besides Barnabas and the other unnamed benefactors) sold property, “with his wife’s full knowledge…”.A hint of secrecy, something not quite clean, about this giving, but there’s that little word ‘also’.This couple are mimicking the community’s generosity – perhaps especially Barnabas’ (‘Anything you can do…’) but they have a hidden agenda. Or so they think… Ananias had intentionally “kept back part of the money for himself”, but he presented the part as if it were the whole. Clearly, what mattered to this ‘benefactor’ was not the benefit to others but the ‘PR’ value to himself.
Would God permit this deception to mix with the pure generosity of the holy people? Not a chance.The Spirit who raised Jesus from the dead and empowered the first believers is the
Holy Spirit – He promotes and protects holiness. He is the Spirit of Truthwho can, if he chooses, reveal the secrets of the heart. (1 Cor 14:25) The challenge to Ananias was not to deceive Peter, but to deceive the Spirit of God. This ‘giving’ was worldliness masquerading as holiness. Hell hates holiness, because it produces contrast – and God’s reality exposes Satan’s fakery.
When Ananias arrived with his ‘gift’, he had no idea that he was on the edge of eternity. His heart would not survive the shock of discovering that his hypocrisy lay exposed before God. Sapphira, unaware of her husband’s sudden demise, would live a further three hours and then … meet her Maker. Was it still true to say “God is love”at that moment? Yes indeed. He withdrew their breath because He is love. “The Lord is righteous in all His ways”. Would it have been righteous or loving to permit generous love to be replaced by an outright lie? Would other baby believers have been influenced by this hypocrisy? Almost certainly. Would Ananias and his wife, had they survived, become people of influence and did the flock of God need protection from a false shepherd? The question answers itself. The young Christian community was blessed with holy fear. Generosity, love – and holiness, were secured and protected. The holy church, with its saving message, would not be mistaken for the world…